Why does Ghazali identify ‘ilm al-kalam as the highest science?
Does his classification into “religious” and “secular” sciences sound appropriate?
Do you think that the classification is intended to dismiss the secular sciences as less important or even unnecessary, or is Ghazali simply classifying the two types of knowledge on the basis of the sources used by each: revelation in the case of the religious sciences and nature in the case of secular sciences?
When viewed this way, does Ghazali’s elevation of kalam as a combination of the two kinds of sciences make more sense?
Thumbnail: “Family.” Photo credit: Carlotta Roma, 2014. CC BY 2.0
Note: If you have trouble viewing the PDF below, you can find the text here.
The Madrasa Discourses project proposes that a conciliation of traditional Islamic thought with contemporary scientific and philosophical worldviews can result in orthodox affirmations of human dignity essential for peaceful coexistence in a pluralistic world.